Skip to main content

Amelia Dyer , a devil who lived in disguise

Amelia Dyer is believed to have murdered hundreds of babies during the 19th Century. Her crimes led to one of the most sensational trials of the period and shone a spotlight on the Victorian practice of "baby farming". How did a seemingly respectable woman stoop to such cruelty?
On 30 March 1896, a parcel weighted down with a brick was fished out of the River Thames in Reading.
Inside, swaddled in layers of linen, newspaper and brown paper, was the partially decomposed body of baby Helena Fry. White tape had been wound around her neck, with a knot under the left ear.
It was a gruesome discovery, but one which would lead detectives to unravel the crimes of one of the 19th Century's most notorious child killers.
Born in 1837 to a shoemaker in a small village in Bristol, Dyer had endured a tough childhood in which she was the main carer for her mentally ill mother.
As an adult, she became a nurse. But, rather than use her skills to care for people, she embarked on a career doing the exact opposite.
"Baby farming" was a practice common in Victorian England, fuelled by desperate single mothers whose perceived immorality meant they were barred from the workhouse.
Their options were limited, namely to prostitute oneself, starve or, instead, quietly "get rid" of their baby. Baby farmers would offer to take the children off their hands and offer it an alternative future - albeit, not necessarily a happy one.
It was into this world that Dyer stepped in.
NewspaperImage copyrightTHAMES VALLEY POLICE MUSEUM
Image captionDyer advertised her services in newspapers, describing herself as "highly respectable"
Recently widowed and with a daughter to support, she learned of the practice from a colleague. In 1869 she began advertising in local papers - "Married couple with no family would adopt healthy child, nice country home. Terms - £10."
But instead of providing a safe and loving home, she would instead take the child for a fee and murder them - either by starving them, drugging them with an opiate-laced cordial known as Mother's Friend, or by strangulation.
"At that time, baby farming was widespread," said Dr Charlotte Beyer, a lecturer at the University of Gloucester.
"Countless babies and children suffered and died as a result of this practice and in many cases, 'fostering' meant killing - slowly or quickly."
Dyer
Image captionDyer began killing her victims by overdosing them with a cordial known as Mother's Friend
The social conditions within Victorian England appear to have enabled Dyer to get away with conducting her grim business for almost 30 years.
With high infant mortality rates being a sad fact of Victorian life, early deaths often escaped the notice of the authorities.
Dyer travelled from her homes in Bristol and Reading to as far afield as Liverpool and Plymouth, charging between £10 and £80 - equivalent to about £1,000 and £8,000 today - for her services.
Most babies left in her care were murdered within days, or in some cases within hours, said PC Colin Boyes, curator of the Thames Valley Police museum, which houses an exhibition about her crimes.
Angela Buckley, author of Amelia Dyer and the Baby Farm Murders, said her victims' parents would not have known she planned to kill their children.
"They believed that they were sending their child to a happy home," she said.
Her luck ran out briefly in 1879 when doctors became sceptical over the number of deaths certified in her care and she was sentenced to six months' hard labour for neglect.
Amelia DyerImage copyrightTHAMES VALLEY POLICE MUSEUM
Image captionDyer turned to baby farming after the death of her husband in 1869
Dyer
Image captionPackaging found with the body of Helena Fry contained clues which led to Dyer's capture
But it was not enough to deter her from continuing her grisly business. Upon her release, Dyer changed her modus operandi.
After a brief spell lodging in Cardiff, she relocated to Reading in 1895 and, realising the folly of involving doctors to issue death certificates, began disposing of the bodies herself by throwing them in the River Thames.
But it was this which led to her eventual downfall.
When Helena Fry's body was fished from the water, Det Con James Beattie Anderson examined the packaging - now on display at the police museum - and spotted a clue.
The packaging bore a Midland Railway stamp dated 24 October 1895 and was marked Bristol Temple Meads.
More importantly, he could make out the smudged name and address of a Mrs Thomas of 26 Piggott's Road, Caversham - Dyer's married name and former address.
Caversham LockImage copyrightSTEVE DANIELS
Image captionDyer turned to disposing the bodies of infants herself to avoid suspicious doctors
The search for a murderer took him to the town, where neighbours told him she had moved to Kensington Road in Reading.
On arrival, the detective found piles of baby clothing and numerous receipts from advertisements in various newspapers from across the country.
White edging tape identical to that discovered around Fry's neck was also uncovered and on 3 April 1896 - four days after her body was discovered - Dyer was arrested and charged with having feloniously killed a child.
Six more babies were found after the Thames and Kennett were dredged, all with the same tape around their necks.
One parcel spotted near Clappers Pond revealed a particularly gruesome discovery for Det Con Anderson.
"Taking it straight to the mortuary, it was confirmed that the corpse was that of a female child, aged about 12 months," explained Ms Buckley.
"It was in more of an advanced state of decomposition than any other of the bodies recovered - so much so that that when the parcel was opened, the body and head fell to pieces."
Dyer
Image captionThe evidence used to convict Dyer was later found in the loft a house belonging to Det Con Anderson's relative
On 22 May 1896, she appeared at the Old Bailey for trial. The only defence and explanation the 57-year-old offered was insanity - having previously been committed to asylums in Bristol.
But prosecutors argued her exhibitions of mental instability were merely a ploy to avoid suspicion.
The true scale of her crimes is hard to estimate. At her most active, eyewitnesses reported seeing as many as six babies a day being taken into her home.
"Given that Dyer practised as a baby farmer for some 30 years, it is likely that she was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of children," said Ms Buckley.
"She had only spent nine months in Caversham but Reading police found evidence that she had cared for at least 15 babies at her home during this time.
"The idea of women killing anyone was very shocking, but the fact that she killed babies was beyond the pale."
Dyer
Image captionEach of Dyer's victims were strangled with white tape, which as she later told the police "was how you could tell it was one of mine"
Transcription of Amelia Dyer’s confessionImage copyrightTHAMES VALLEY POLICE MUSEUM
Image captionDyer confessed to the crimes shortly before she was hanged
In addition to gaining justice for those she killed, the case against Dyer also highlighted a dark underworld in which mothers were giving their children away.
"The trial brought to light the otherwise repressed but widespread practice of baby farming, and revealed the horrors and inhumanity of this trade," Dr Beyer said.
"It took the Dyer case for the law to be pursued more effectively and rigorously at a national and local level, and for the then newly-established NSPCC to begin to become more influential."
Dyer was hanged at Newgate Prison on Wednesday, 10 June 1896, having eventually confessed to her crimes.
Horrified residents in Reading carved wooden crosses in the handrail of Clappers footbridge - a memorial to the innocent victims of a prolific baby killer who took advantage of society's intolerance to exploit its most desperate members.

Source: bbcnews.com
Author: Sarah Lee

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reincarnation from Egypt

When Dorothy Eady arrived to Egypt for the first time, it was obvious to her that she had been there before. But her last visit near the Nile may have taken place thousands of years earlier. Dorothy was born on January 16, 1904 in the London suburb of Blackhearth. Doctors believed that she would not survive a terrible fall when she was three years old. However, it seems that the accident she faced was the beginning of her unbelievable life - a moment of opening the gate to the memories of a past life. Over the years, many skeptics tried to disprove Eady’s mystifying tale, but nobody could ever fully negate that she was one of pharaoh Seti I’s (c. 1290 - 1279 BC) lovers. An Ancient King’s Lover? Dorothy grew up in a Christian family and she attended church regularly when she was young. One day, her parents took her to the British Museum. While looking at the photograph of the temple of Seti I, a pharaoh of the 19th dynasty of the New Kingdom Period (and the father of Rameses ...

Second Birth of Buddha ... Mulbekh, India

Situated 45 km from Kargil and 260 km from Leh in Ladakh region of Jammu and Kashmir, Mulbekh Monastery is famous for its two gompas and the nine mtr tall statue of Maitreya Buddha. The Mulbekh Monastery with its gompas stands on a peak above the Srinagar-Leh highway. The two gompas are of Drukpa (new Buddhist school) and Gelugpa (old Buddhist school). Another reason for Mulbekh Monastery’s fame is the 30 ft long limestone sculpture of Maitreya Buddha. Carved onto the rock face, the sculpture of standing Maitreya Buddha overlooks the National Highway 1D between Leh and Kargil. The sculpture measures nine meter from base to its top. Maitreyas is also known as Chamba so Mulbekh Monastery is popularly known as Mulbekh Chamba. Along with the nine meter tall Maitreya sculpture, there are many prized relics along with the statues and frescoes in the monastery. The rock sculpture is believed to have been carved by Ladakhi missionaries to propagate Buddhism. Though the rock sculpture repre...